Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
搞笑欢乐+青春激情+好看的画面构造+五位不同类型的185以上大帅哥 我真的瞬间沦陷 爱惨了呜呜呜呜 祝大火！绝对是黑马（全程看都在夸帅+可爱 太养眼了）有幸见到五位主演 还主动问了问题 记录一下哈哈
算是院线商业小成本真诚作品。只是可惜太过规整按节拍器写出来的本子，但又好几个点都没打通，就水了一水过去了，这让我看得很不爽。
不是特别好，主演里缺少一个妻夫木聪这样的超新星帅哥，理完发我都分不出谁是谁。编排上也没有原版那种好笑，感情戏太隐晦了。但最后一大群只穿裤衩的男生奔出来还是觉得好可爱啊，男生最可爱就是这种时候，人生的高光时刻。男主角在医院里哭，把我也差点看哭了，可怜又傻气。可能这就是不早恋的社会主义接班人特色吧，砥砺奋进最动人。
还是很有感染力的翻拍，青春，热血，中二，很怀念。
最关键的那段反转，本应是情感和戏剧高潮，结果又拍成”抖音治国”，太粗暴敷衍了。除此以外，基本可以吊打其他95%国产青春片。
有这么一类日本都市青年题材电影，拍模棱两可的爱情、低欲静谧的生活、毫不起眼的梦想，不定期会找来看看。没什么特别好看之处，只是这类片可以提供一些琐碎的感觉。
不如《花束般的恋爱》好看。叙事节奏不行，剧本有大问题，24分钟弃剧。
五个男生都很特别，只是学霸存在感太弱，整个角色更像是为了引出他有个男主暗恋的姐姐。感情线虽是条未完结的支线，但真的好青春，仅仅是发现“原来她认识我”这样细微的事，都会高兴好一阵子。// 整个故事后1/3就是为波折而波折，把前面的快乐硬拖得索然无味。// 镜头美感超赞，是整部电影最大的亮点，尤其星光下屋顶上独自蹦床的少年，那剪影孤独却满是希望。// 辛柏青这个发型真的不错，五个男生剪了圆寸后发现李孝谦最帅。圆寸帅才是真的帅！！！
比较工整的青春片，虽然情节有些老套，但是看得出是认真拍的，不是为了捞一笔钱而已，但要说有多好那确实也有点撒谎，艺术创作也有通货膨胀，也必须推陈出新。
日本小忧郁式叙事，突破和没能突破在于台词，这部其实没突破，不过唬一些年轻观众还可以，毕竟是日本电影传统类型之一，氛围是可以把握的。
正好是27号 吃块蛋糕吧
摄影不错，气氛尚佳，喜剧乏力，剧情普通。这片子确实难宣发。我觉得男孩可以用新人，教练戏份应该请个大牌点的，或者稍微话题性强一点的。然后再让男孩们组成一个什么扑水少年限定团，拍一个时尚杂志卖卖肉，上一两个国民度高的综艺露露脸，还可以在公众号里软文上多打一下性别刻板印象的牌，还是能吸睛的。
花样年华，青春正当时，剧情不拖沓，年轻的演员表现很好
没看原版，本土化部分做的挺好的，故事也挺完整，青春真好
扑水吧少年，都寄吧哥们。
翻拍得还不错，挺难的，因为根本不符合我国国情。变成团体操虽然很鸡血但也是最大的败笔。袁教练才是真实世界的吧。。。。。
看完就把《花束般的恋爱》扣了一星，消逝在时间里的记忆，静谧流动的城市映像。
大二的下半年以后，开始经常找高中时候喜欢的男孩子出去玩。连续四周的展览和滨江的风，livehouse关门后闭店的街和摇晃的啤酒，水族馆里给鱼配奇怪的声音，还是骑错的骑对的骑到汗流浃背的自行车...这一部，21年看《花束般的恋爱》，20年看《爱情是什么》，还是再早一点看《你的鸟儿会唱歌》，总不免被其中某些桥段戳中，倒也没什么文青的高傲与特别，只是它们更像情感暧昧温和的样子。
青春洋溢，少年怀春。
青春励志与反叛不羁，青涩质朴与热血涌动，非名角的出演让片子看起来似乎少了一些“用力”，更显“轻盈”。满屏的肉体真是让人目不眨眼，可咋感觉有几位演员肉眼可见的年纪大？显老？听到毛毛的声音真是笑死。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
