Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
就该多拍主旋律电影，就该多多文化输出，强烈支持！
期待电视剧版
四星半吧，不合理的地方还是有很多，但是真的把我看哭了。实到1人，恢复七连建制。哭了。边吃饭边看的，分了三次看完，如果连着看可能也会觉得太长吧。
跟第一部半斤八两，看完也没留下太多印象，悬在天上的主旋律命题作文。我一贯的观点，这两盘菜只是在恰当的时间做出来了，时势造票房，菜品本身不做评价。
战争惨烈悲壮，美国凭借强大的工业实力惨胜志愿军。新中国万岁！
单位组织的献礼影片，单就片子来说真的很一般啊
只能说有些情节有点夸张了，为什么伍千里被烧死，而伍万里毫发无损半天才活过来……
这部电影里的特效和好莱坞的差距就像朝鲜战争里中美之间的国力差距一样大。
影片高潮不断，战斗不断，马不停蹄，几乎无修整就接连奔赴下一个战场，慢镜头和长镜头穿插得当，是电影很好的注释和表达。
咣咣咣biubiubiu轰！革命先烈永垂不朽
能让你在看到先辈牺牲的时候，
比上一部而言，战斗场面更宏达了，作为一部战争题材的电影，所表现出来的战斗细节不很到位的，唯一的缺点可能就是美军的战斗力偏弱了。
易烊千玺这个角色虽然活到了最后，可是所有的行为从头到尾都有点迷惑，有些好奇他的粉丝对这部评价如何
突突突大场面很多，文戏有点看不进去，导致观影过程中我的悲伤情绪大部分不是源于爱国主义情怀而是小家小爱，当然两者没有谁比谁更高贵，就感觉编剧和导演可以做的更好吧。
相对比来说血肉模糊的场景已经比较少了，故意一瞬间带过
没有冻不死的英雄，也没有打不死的英雄，只有军人的荣耀！
致敬为新中国成立和发展的革命先辈。
真实历史上，水门桥三炸三修，最后也没挡住美军撤退。后来说迟滞了美军的撤退，但基本也是做无用功，是被对手用强大工业能力辗压的。
相当不错，春节早早起床就是为了看这部电影，画面相当给力，。
（华夏影城长沙龙湾商业广场店）陪长辈去影院看完了这部电影，第一感觉就是真的太长了，电影叙事大逻辑含糊，很拖拉。说实在的，剧情、画面、演员的演技特效都可以，就真的是太拖拉了。原本以为结束了，又整一个小高潮，高潮完了想着终于要结束了吧，md又来一个刺点，转折太多都有点看腻了。另外最后是哪位大佬把三位指导导的戏合在一起的？敢情是谁也不想得罪么，电影结尾就是三位导演的三段结尾生接在一起，甚至看风格就知道哪一段结局是哪一位大佬的风格。最后一段结局结束的时候的结尾音乐也是很硬，和画面不相融。整体来看，从画面、演技来看，给电影四星，剧情拖拉扣一星，综合三星。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
